Scales and exponents
One small exponent $h$ fixes every rate in the construction. This page lists the rates and lets you move $h$.
Write $\tau = 1-t$. The core is a column whose radius shrinks like $\tau^{1/2}$, the viscous length, and whose height shrinks more slowly, like $\tau^{1/2-h}$. The anisotropy is the point: it is what lets the speed grow faster than $\tau^{-1/2}$ while the energy still vanishes.
Similarity variables
The paper fixes $0 < h < 1/100$ and writes $A = \tfrac12 + h$ and $D = \tfrac12 - h$. In cylindrical coordinates $(r,\theta,z)$ it introduces a concentration scale $q>0$ and an axial variable $\eta\in(-1,1)$ through
On a fixed compact set of $(X,\eta)$ away from $\eta=\pm1$ one has $q\asymp\tau$, so $q$ is the time remaining, reparametrized so that the axial coordinate has its own rate. The leading axisymmetric field is built from three profiles $E$, $U$, $\Pi$ of $(X,\eta)$:
In English: swirl and axial speed grow like $q^{-1/2-h}$, the radial inflow is weaker by a factor $q^{h}$, and the pressure is the square of the speed. Regularity on the axis is a condition on the profiles, $E/\sqrt{2X}$ smooth at $X=0$, and incompressibility fixes $V_0$ from $U$.
The rates
Everything below follows from the two length exponents and the one speed exponent. The demo plots them.
| Quantity | Scale | What it does as $\tau\downarrow 0$ |
|---|---|---|
| core radius $\ell_r$ | $\tau^{1/2}$ | the viscous length; shrinks |
| core height $\ell_z$ | $\tau^{1/2-h}$ | shrinks, but slower: $\ell_r/\ell_z\asymp\tau^{h}\to 0$ |
| swirl, axial speed | $\tau^{-1/2-h}$ | unbounded |
| radial speed | $O(\tau^{-1/2})$ | unbounded, but smaller by $\tau^{h}$ |
| core volume | $\tau^{3/2-h}$ | vanishes |
| core energy | $\tau^{1/2-3h}$ | vanishes, since $h<1/6$ |
| core dissipation rate | $\tau^{-1/2-3h}$ | diverges but is integrable in time |
| angular Reynolds number | $\tau^{-h}$ | diverges, slowly |
| radial Reynolds number | $O(1)$ | viscosity stays in the leading balance |
| axial / radial diffusion | $\tau^{2h}$ | the expansion parameter of the background corrections |
Why the anisotropy
With $h=0$ the core would be an isotropic self-similar vortex with speed $\tau^{-1/2}$. Such a flow has $\int|u|^3$ bounded, and by Escauriaza, Seregin and Šverák that cannot blow up without a force, and by the scaling argument of Nečas, Růžička and Šverák there is no nontrivial self-similar profile at all. A positive $h$ is a way past both. The speed exceeds the critical rate $\tau^{-1/2}$ by $\tau^{-h}$, the column is slender enough for the energy $\tau^{1/2-3h}$ still to vanish, and the axial direction supplies a second small parameter, $\ell_r^2/\ell_z^2 = \tau^{2h}$, in which the background can be corrected order by order.
The angular Reynolds number $\tau^{-h}$ says the fluid makes ever more turns in one radial diffusion time. That is what amplifies the pulses at the edge of the core. The radial Reynolds number $O(1)$ says viscosity never drops out of the radial balance. That is what makes this a Navier–Stokes construction rather than an Euler one dressed up.
Viscosity is a change of units
The construction is done at $\nu = 1$ and transferred to any $\nu>0$ by
Time is untouched, so the singular time stays at one. Lengths scale by $\sqrt\nu$ and speeds by $\sqrt\nu$. The energy scales by $\nu^{5/2}$. This matters for the molecular limit: the core radius in metres is $\sqrt{\nu\tau}$ times a fixed number, and the core speed is $\sqrt{\nu/\tau}$ times a fixed number, so their product is $\nu$ times a fixed number for every fluid.
Next: the core.